When I first began studying history in order to determine that (let's call it "fundamentalist Christianity") wasn't just a reactionary belief system started in the 1900s but that there has been a silver thread running through history where people have always been believing the orthodox truth, I was fascinated to discover things I'd never known before.
Just today, I learned something new. The following is adapted from a recent article from Creation Ministries International:
Modern Feminism (called 'second or third wave') promotes abortion as the pinnacle of women's rights and women's equality. This feminism has been in play since the '60s and '80s, respectively. But what about the original feminism? The feminism of the mid-1800s that championed women's suffrage (right to vote) and sought to criminalize domestic violence, among other things that very obviously were intended to protect women?
1. The Revolution, the newsletter of Susan B. Anthony (1820–1906),
described abortion as ‘child murder’, ‘infanticide’ and
‘foeticide’.
2. "Every woman knows that if she were free, she would never bear an unwished-for child,
nor think of murdering one before its birth." ~ Victoria Woodhull (1838–1927), the first female US
presidential candidate
3. Abortion is a ‘disgusting and degrading crime,' and
4. "When you consider that women have been treated as property, it is degrading to women
that we should treat our children as property to be disposed of as we see fit." ~ Elizabeth Cady Stanton (1815–1902), who
organized the first women’s rights convention in Seneca Falls, NY (1848)
5. The mother of the feminist movement, Mary Wollstonecraft (1759–1797) had earlier
written, A Vindication of the Rights of Women, where she condemned those
who would ‘either destroy the embryo in the womb, or cast it off when born.’
Early feminists were against abortion. Modern "feminism" isn't feminism. It's violence against women and degrading to both women and men.
If that rubs you the wrong way, try your hand at reading the article and see if you still disagree: http://creation.com/abortion-an-indispensable-right-or-violence-against-women-sex-selection-aborting-girls
It makes me proud (and not of myself, but of the Truth, mind you) to know that what I believe is not only right, but it has been right and recognized as being right for all of recorded history, such that this truth has not only been with us all along, but it has been the pillar on which all of our civilization stands. Those who would deny the Truth (I speak of God) would seek to undermine our society and destroy the whole world if they could--willingly or unwillingly, knowingly or unknowingly.
Choose a side. Do it wisely.
~ Rak Chazak
Showing posts with label abortion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abortion. Show all posts
Sunday, May 19, 2013
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
If Obama Had a Baby....
...it would look like the baby Gosnell murdered.
If you don't understand the reference, I'm mocking Obama's statement about Trayvon Martin, the black Florida youth who was shot by George Zimmerman, a hispanic man who made a 911 call about a suspicious character while serving in his capacity as the neighborhood watch, moments before. Obama personally inserted himself into the news by saying that 'if he had a son, he would look like Trayvon.' Not only is this utterly irrelevant, but it's distasteful for the President to try to sway public opinion in favor of Trayvon being a victim by making him seem more sympathetic, when the facts of the case are still not yet fully known to the public, since the trial isn't set to begin until next month.
In a curious irony, Obama kept himself completely out of any media exposure with reference to the Kermit Gosnell trial, which arguably has much more relevance to the national interest. Why might he be so silent now, whereas before he had no qualms with making a murder accusation his personal business?
It could be that Gosnell, the now-convicted murderer, is black? It could be that the babies he aborted, and the babies he killed after they were already born, were likewise black? I believe Obama is racist. I think he decided to take Trayvon's side because he sympathized with him on the basis of skin color and some strange notion of fighting back against the "white oppressor," given that Zimmerman is a very "white-sounding" name. That George turned out to be a mixed man became a bit of an embarrassment for Obama, seeing as he thinks he's the savior of all hispanics as well. Obama's problem is that his identity-politics comes into conflict with his social agendas. He wants abortion to be fully free and legal at all costs, but he also wants to be seen as the guy all black people should vote for because he has their best interests at heart. So when a black murderer murders black babies in an abortion "clinic," that's embarrassing for Obama.
Even more embarrassing is the fact that Obama voted four times, while he was a senator, to make the stuff that Gosnell did LEGAL. That's the bottom line why I think the President has avoided making public comments about the trial. The fact is that according to his voting record, Obama doesn't think that Gosnell should have been accused of murder, much less convicted. If he were to speak against Gosnell, he'd be called out on his hypocrisy. And if he said what he really thinks, he'd alienate his voter base by revealing himself to be very, very anti-poor, anti-minority, and anti-woman.
Here is a hub link that gives source information to prove that Obama voted against making it illegal to kill a baby born after a botched abortion over four times: http://www.jillstanek.com/2008/02/links-to-barack-obamas-votes-on-illinois-born-alive-infant-protection-act/
~ Rak Chazak
[edit: further ironic is the fact that during the trial, Obama held a speech at a Planned Parenthood conference, ending with the cringe-worthy statement, "Thank you, Planned Parenthood. God bless you."]
If you don't understand the reference, I'm mocking Obama's statement about Trayvon Martin, the black Florida youth who was shot by George Zimmerman, a hispanic man who made a 911 call about a suspicious character while serving in his capacity as the neighborhood watch, moments before. Obama personally inserted himself into the news by saying that 'if he had a son, he would look like Trayvon.' Not only is this utterly irrelevant, but it's distasteful for the President to try to sway public opinion in favor of Trayvon being a victim by making him seem more sympathetic, when the facts of the case are still not yet fully known to the public, since the trial isn't set to begin until next month.
In a curious irony, Obama kept himself completely out of any media exposure with reference to the Kermit Gosnell trial, which arguably has much more relevance to the national interest. Why might he be so silent now, whereas before he had no qualms with making a murder accusation his personal business?
It could be that Gosnell, the now-convicted murderer, is black? It could be that the babies he aborted, and the babies he killed after they were already born, were likewise black? I believe Obama is racist. I think he decided to take Trayvon's side because he sympathized with him on the basis of skin color and some strange notion of fighting back against the "white oppressor," given that Zimmerman is a very "white-sounding" name. That George turned out to be a mixed man became a bit of an embarrassment for Obama, seeing as he thinks he's the savior of all hispanics as well. Obama's problem is that his identity-politics comes into conflict with his social agendas. He wants abortion to be fully free and legal at all costs, but he also wants to be seen as the guy all black people should vote for because he has their best interests at heart. So when a black murderer murders black babies in an abortion "clinic," that's embarrassing for Obama.
Even more embarrassing is the fact that Obama voted four times, while he was a senator, to make the stuff that Gosnell did LEGAL. That's the bottom line why I think the President has avoided making public comments about the trial. The fact is that according to his voting record, Obama doesn't think that Gosnell should have been accused of murder, much less convicted. If he were to speak against Gosnell, he'd be called out on his hypocrisy. And if he said what he really thinks, he'd alienate his voter base by revealing himself to be very, very anti-poor, anti-minority, and anti-woman.
Here is a hub link that gives source information to prove that Obama voted against making it illegal to kill a baby born after a botched abortion over four times: http://www.jillstanek.com/2008/02/links-to-barack-obamas-votes-on-illinois-born-alive-infant-protection-act/
~ Rak Chazak
[edit: further ironic is the fact that during the trial, Obama held a speech at a Planned Parenthood conference, ending with the cringe-worthy statement, "Thank you, Planned Parenthood. God bless you."]
Friday, April 12, 2013
What's Wrong With America, in Miniature
What's wrong with America?
Not, you might think, its rationalization of immorality. No, if people did wrong things and acknowledged that they were wrong, that would be one thing. When you are so morally depraved that your conscience doesn't even flinch at evil, to the point that you happily mock and make jokes about serious things like murder and exploitation of the young and of innocents, then you are more than just misguided. Your cup of iniquity runneth over.
(click on image to enlarge)
This is an image from a discussion thread at my university, where one student had posted about the trial of Kermit Gosnell. He is accused of killing babies that were born alive at his abortion clinic. [To my knowledge] Not a single televised media source has reported on this issue to this date, although the Alternative Media, both conservative and liberal, has been reporting on the issue.
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/04/why-dr-kermit-gosnells-trial-should-be-a-front-page-story/274944/
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/04/12/why-isn-t-the-trial-of-abortionist-kermit-gosnell-on-every-front-page-in-america.html
http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/kermit-gosnell/
~ Rak Chazak
Not, you might think, its rationalization of immorality. No, if people did wrong things and acknowledged that they were wrong, that would be one thing. When you are so morally depraved that your conscience doesn't even flinch at evil, to the point that you happily mock and make jokes about serious things like murder and exploitation of the young and of innocents, then you are more than just misguided. Your cup of iniquity runneth over.
(click on image to enlarge)This is an image from a discussion thread at my university, where one student had posted about the trial of Kermit Gosnell. He is accused of killing babies that were born alive at his abortion clinic. [To my knowledge] Not a single televised media source has reported on this issue to this date, although the Alternative Media, both conservative and liberal, has been reporting on the issue.
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/04/why-dr-kermit-gosnells-trial-should-be-a-front-page-story/274944/
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/04/12/why-isn-t-the-trial-of-abortionist-kermit-gosnell-on-every-front-page-in-america.html
http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/kermit-gosnell/
~ Rak Chazak
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)